Brisbane has worst access to public transport of all state capitals, says survey
Patchy or non-existent public transport in the suburbs leaves millions of people with no other choice but to drive everywhere, prompting calls for a national standard for ‘turn up and go’ bus and train services.
Only half of the 15 million people living in the five biggest cities have access to frequent, all-day public transport and the Climate Council warns this is contributing to Australiaās transport emissions and congesting streets.
Head of policy and advocacy at the think tank, Jennifer Rayner, said state and territory governments should commit to a minimum standard of frequent, all-day public transport in the capital cities, akin to the Gonski commitment to deliver high-quality education to every child.
āTo get us out of our expensive, polluting cars, governments need to centre shared and active transport in all transport and land-use planning,ā Dr Rayner said.
āThis includes new investments that enable the uptake of shared and active transport, like better-connected footpaths and walkways, and improving the quality and frequency of public transport services.ā
She stressed the importance of co-benefits, with more public transport use helping to bring down transport-related emissions but also leading to cleaner air and safer, less-congested streets.
You might like
While electric vehicles were important for cutting transport emissions ā the nationās second largest contributor, after energy ā simply replacing petrol cars with clean alternatives would do little to ease congestion.
Mondayās Climate Council report found Brisbane had the worst public transport access, with about two-thirds of the city without frequent, all-day public transport.
Sydney came out on top but one-third of all residents did not have the minimum services needed to āget people out of carsā, which the council says is buses and trains running every 15 minutes between 7am-7pm, and within 800 metres of homes.
There was also a divide between wealthier and poorer areas, with the former typically better serviced.
Stay informed, daily
Those living in high-growth areas in middle and outer suburbs were also āsignificantly under-servedā by public transport.
Urbis associate director Riley Flanigan said Australian cities would have better public transport infrastructure if it was planned and delivered in the early phases of urban development, rather than trying to retrofit it into an existing neighbourhood.
By leading with train lines and other key infrastructure, it is cheaper than buying the land retroactively and there is less community opposition to deal with.
āIn more enlightened places like Europe, they actually use the infrastructure to drive the renewal, in order to basically choose where the growth goes, rather than just doing it more organically,ā he told AAP.
Much of Australiaās āpiece-mealā approach to infrastructure delivery stemmed from politics and āthis kind of obsession with business cases and feasibilityā, Mr Flanigan said.
Without existing residents to generate revenue to fund maintenance and operations of a new train line, for example, it was hard to make a business case stack up, he said, which becomes āa stick you could beat a politician with if you wanted toā.
Dr Rayner said it was hard and expensive to retrofit infrastructure into existing suburbs, especially heavy rail, and that was why she was an advocate for reliable and high-frequency bus services.
She said the shift to electric buses was an opportunity to attract people toward a quieter, more comfortable service when compared to ageing combustion-engine fleets.
Want to see more stories from InDaily Qld in your Google search results?
- Click here to set InDaily Qld as a preferred source.
- Tick the box next to "InDaily Qld". That's it.
